An Essay on Criticism, Alexander Pope, Summary, Analysis, Detailed Overview and Quotes

Introduction: Alexander Pope wrote An Essay on Criticism in poetic form which was published in 1711. This poem represents the Neoclassical beliefs about criticism and poetry which strongly asserts the importance of adherence to the Classical rules.

Read the Original Text

Detailed Overview

  • He makes a compelling argument for the position that poetry should either be composed naturally or in accordance with the predefined artificial principles established by the classical poets.
  • The idea of Pope's essay is neoclassical, following in the footsteps of Horace and Boileau.
  • Pope contends that a literary work's value is determined by its fidelity to Nature, not by whether it is ancient or modern.
  • True wit contains this natural truth. The two are interconnected, and nature can be found in both the subject and the mode of communication.
  • The essence of humanity can be discovered in everyday humanity, not in any oddity.
  • Pope maintained that human nature is constant and static.
  • This essay explores the harmonious coexistence of good poetry with literary criticism.
  • According to him, poetry and criticism are both related to nature and wit, and the finest examples of both are divinely inspired.
  • Pope views both poetry and criticism as forms of art. He believes that both are built on the same literary principles.
  • According to him, a critic must consider an author as someone who is aware of all of his or her attributes and who is not just conscious of their own abilities.
  • Since a critic has the advantage of understanding a work in its entirety, his criticism should not be limited to a few elements, such as the author's use of devices or flowery language, but should instead focus on the work as a whole.
  • For the creative process to be balanced and controlled, poets should also have critical faculties.
  • The benchmark to be used before making a judgement should be nature.
  • His view of nature is more in line with the mediaeval concepts of order and harmony than it is with Romanticism, which emphasises the outward look of nature.
  • Like many neo-classical scholars and writers, he suggests that nature should serve as the source of artistic inspiration.
  • Poets' task is to convey natural insight and universal truth.
  • In Ancient Greece, a critic's job was to carefully evaluate and admire art; today, this is supplanted with attacks on poets.
  • He counsels both poets and critics to avoid prejudice and adhere to ancient principles from the Classical Period.
  • Pope lauds Horace as the best literary critic in history. Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Petronius, Quintilian, and Longinus are further figures that Pope  admires. He views them as authentic heirs to the classical tradition.
  • Pope refers to the Renaissance as the "Golden Days" that contributed to the development of the arts and criticism in Europe, taking into account the historical processes that shaped art.
  • He presents his own ideas in the tradition of Renaissance philosophers who held the works of the classical authors in the highest regard.
  • Summary of the Text

    Introduction: In the three parts of his poem "An Essay on Criticism," Alexander Pope discusses the standards of conduct for critics. Throughout his career, Pope has faced criticism for his work, background, religion, and physical appearance. Pope has a lot to say to critics regarding the mistakes they frequently make and how they might effectively carry out their duties in order to promote the creative process. The poem explores Pope's belief that poetry is suffering from a cultural decline and what, in Pope's view, poets and critics must do to reverse this trend. He divides his discussion into three sections:

    Part I

    Pope says that poets and critics alike should be familiar with the standards for poetry established in classical Greece and Rome. These guidelines were founded on natural laws like balance, symmetry, and simplicity in beauty. Both writers and their critics must possess sound judgement and wit in order to properly "First follow NATURE." While it's crucial for authors to follow the norms, critics should also be aware that sometimes fresh perspectives are required for rapidly evolving facts. Only very gifted, clever, and accomplished writers are given an exception to the norm.

    Part II

    This part charts the fall of Part 1's heyday while listing the mistakes made by Pope's contemporaries in the fields of poetry and criticism. He claims that some poets use flowery language to cover up a lack of content. Some critics focus on one little issue and magnify it rather than examining the entire work. This essay enumerates all the various ways in which their criticism is incorrect and useless. Some common errors include: focusing exclusively on the rules and ignoring the content; rating poetry based on their metaphors, imagery, or other less important characteristics; and praising works just because they are novel, extreme, foreign, or they support particular viewpoints.

    Part III

    The final section of "An Essay on Criticism" takes a more upbeat and motivating stance. Pope looks at the qualities of a great reviewer. Integrity, humility, and courage are the best traits for a critic to have. Pope pays a lengthy tribute to the Greek, Roman, and English authors who, in his opinion, best mimic the classical authors as the poem comes to a close. The best critics are fair and analytical, carefully weighing their words in light of the fact that they can make or break an author's career.

    Analysis in Bullet Points

  • Year of publication: 1711
  • Alexander Pope (1688-1744) was a celebrated poet, translator, and satirist.
  • Pope is a key figure in the Age of Enlightenment also known as the Neoclassical period (1660-1820)
  • The Enlightenment Age placed mind over heart, that is, reason and logic over emotions.
  • Composed in heroic couplets (pairs of adjacent rhyming lines of iambic pentameter)
  • Written as response to the ongoing debate whether poets should follow classic rules or not!
  • The essay supports the neoclassical notions .
  • Famous Quotes from the Text

    "To err is human; to forgive, divine"

    "A little learning is a dang'rous thing"

    "Fools rush in where angels fear to tread".

    “Words are like Leaves; and where they most abound, Much Fruit of Sense beneath is rarely found.”

    “Authors are partial to their wit, 'tis true, But are not critics to their judgment, too?”

    “Tis not a lip, or eye, we beauty call, But the joint force and full result of all.”

    "Men must be taught as if you taught them not, And things unknown propos'd as things forgot."

    Attend our free course: Literary Criticism II Syllabus

    Important Note: You can share your interpretations and join the conversation below!

    Cookie Consent
    We serve cookies on this site to analyze traffic, remember your preferences, and optimize your experience.
    It seems there is something wrong with your internet connection. Please connect to the internet and start browsing again.
    AdBlock Detected!
    We have detected that you are using adblocking plugin in your browser.
    The revenue we earn by the advertisements is used to manage this website, we request you to whitelist our website in your adblocking plugin.
    Site is Blocked
    Sorry! This site is not available in your country.